A Senate question on language issues has resulted in

Official Languages Commissioner Graham Fraser say[ing] he wants to see whether the government respected its legal obligations when it made the decision.

(Canadian Press)

and

Graham Fraser, commissaire aux langues officielles, a annoncé aujourd’hui qu’il allait procéder à une enquête sur la décision d’Industrie Canada d’éliminer le questionnaire complet du Recensement de 2011.

(Site Officiel du Commissariat)

Phew! Some are taking their offices seriously to ensure that Ministers follow law. The Census has many legislative obligations and one can’t just change it. Those laws are there for a reason, and even the Industry Minister can’t change that. Fortunately for us, there are many dedicated former Statistics Canada employees and Chief Statisticians who stand up for what is right. There are also numerous other organizations working on this issue:

The Canadian Economics Association, the Canada Census Committee, the Canadian Association of University Teachers, the Statistical Society of Canada, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and multiple newspaper editorial boards are among those that have spoken out against the decision.

While others such as

representatives from business and finance, health and social services and other levels of government say the long form is vital to the country’s health and well-being

are forming coalitions to call on government to reverse the census decision. Even the cartographers, archivists and librarians are on the case with the Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA) and have written a letter to Mr. Clement on this issue. Data pundits, experts, academics, associations, cities, and business people have spoken loud and clear – do not politically interfere with the Canadian Census.

And so, what does the minister do when his smartest citizens provide him with advice on what not to do? On his own public consultation, he removes the #2 most popular submission and relegates it to outcast status as his Media Relations personnel claims that:

changes to the Census are important, [but] they are not directly related to the development of a digital economy strategy for Canada

So there we have it. The nations smart people speak and the nation’s leaders play hide and seek with consultations, make up evidence to make decisions and forget to check and see if they might have broken any laws. This is the state of our democracy folks. Media relations people are the new spokespeople. Democracies are fragile indeed.

References:

  • CIQSS Centre de données de recherche, Recensement 2011.
  • Canadian Press: Census discussion disappears from federal consultation site
  • Canadian Press: Languages watchdog launches census probe
  • Commissaire aux langues officielles: entreprend une enquête sur la décision du gouvernement du Canada d’éliminer le questionnaire complet du Recensement de 2011
  • Canadian News Wire: Media Advisory – Broad coalition calls on government to reverse census decision
  • Liberal Senate Forum: 2011 Census
  • Winnipeg Free Press: Official languages commissioner launches investigation into census change
  • CanWest: Former top StatsCan officials among those opposing census changes
  • ACMLA: Letter to Tony Clement concerning the 2011 decision to cancel the mandatory Long-Form Questionnaire
  • David Eaves: The Census weak link: What the Liberals, Bloc & NDP should do
  • Digital Economy Consultation: Reinstate our Census Long Form aka Questionnaire 2B
  • Here is the response I received just moments ago from Industry Canada:

    The Government of Canada is interested in the ideas and views of all Canadians.

    While the changes to the Census are important, they are not directly related to the development of a digital economy strategy for Canada.

    Hence, the post was moved to the off-topic section of the site. It is still available for reading and can be accessed by searching the consultation web site and at its original URL (http://de-en.gc.ca/2010/07/06/reinstate-our-census-long-form-aka-questionnaire-2b/).

    The site’s Terms of Use clearly state that all postings are expected to be on-topic and relevant, and off-topic ideas will be moved to an off-topic section.

    All the best

    MC
    Michel Cimpaye
    Media Relations
    Industry Canada
    613-943-2502
    email: media-relations-medias@ic.gc.ca

    I responded with the following questions:

    Thank you.

    Can you please explain explicitly how this is off topic? I have read the consultation paper at least 3 times and based on what I have read it fits perfectly in Canada’s Digital Content theme.

    The Census and its digital data inform and direct the knowledge economy, the digital economy for which it is the purpose of this consultation.

    You indicated that there may have been duplication of content. Can you please point me to where such duplication exists? And if that is the case, could you not use the votes received on the Census submission and add them to the duplicate?

    Also, can you please advise who precisely made this decision? Who is responsible for this file and who is responsible for the decision you sent?

    When was the decision made using precisely which criteria?

    How were the 337 +/- Canadians who voted on this submission advised that they were voting on a submission that was removed?

    Is there a public announcements?

    Can you advise if the person who has submitted this has been advised?

    Sincerely
    Tracey

    1984 comes to mind as does the movie Brazil!

    Here is the latest on Media pick-up on cuts to the Census. I am sure I have missed some, and may even have repeated one or two. Please do not hesitate to send more or to point out errors.

  • Global News: Federal report ignores census questionnaire privacy concerns
  • The Progressive Economics Forum: Stephen Harper’s New BFF and Rolling Thunder Census Review
  • Ottawa Citizen: No privacy concerns in census feedback report: Top bureaucrats call for Tories to rethink decision to scrap mandatory long questionnaire
  • Pundits Guide: How the Census is Used in Canadian Elections and Census
  • Liberal Senate Forum: 2011 Census
  • Ottawa Citizen: Change in census law could affect city planning: Federal government plans to make long form voluntary
  • Genealogy in Time: Canada Alters Format of Future Censuses
  • MaCleans: Libertarian if necessary, but not necessarily libertarian
  • Toronto Star: Tory census changes get static from statisticians
  • Canadian Press: Anti-census crusader unsatisfied with change
  • Association of Municipalities of Ontario: Ontario Municipalities Concerned About Recent Federal Census Decision
  • Metropolis British Columbia: An Open Letter from the Canadian Network of Metropolis Centers Canada should keep its Census mandatory and maintain its status as a public resource
  • Letter to the Editor Globe and Mail: Information blackout

    The long form of the census is the source of the most accurate information about the rate and depth of poverty in Canada. This is especially true of after-tax poverty measures, estimates for particular population groups and for small provinces and municipalities. This information is essential evidence for policy development. Is the government trying to hide information about poverty?

  • Toronto Star: Travers: Census change latest move in PM’s dumbing down of Canada
  • Media for Social Change: 2011 Census’ Theatre of Fears
  • Canada online: Base Canadian Government Policy on Facts
  • Canadian Economics Association Open Letter to Clement about the Census Cut
  • Troy Media: Why the census matters
  • CARL Opinion Survey: scroll down or go directly”>Statistics Canada – Census 2011 Changes : Opinion Survey to the survey here
  • Inside Toronto: Toronto council calls federal census decision ‘shortsighted’ Long form document provides critical information for city planning: councillor
  • MaCleans ‘You try to limit the amount of state coercion that you have’
  • BR Newsletter: 2011 Census Long Form – Don’t take my DA away!
  • Rural Ontario Institute: Changes to the 2011 Census Raise Concern
  • Globe and Mail: Ottawa should come to its census: Stop dogging Statscan
  • Montreal Gazette: Clement says census decision stands despite data concerns
  • Globe and Mail: Census revamp prompts debate over the right to reliable data Crowds of people walk in front of Union Station in Toronto. For The Globe and Mail Business community attacks change that makes long-form survey voluntary
  • Federation of Canadian Municipalities: Letter to Tony Clement’s Office
  • Le Devoir: Les scientifiques crient à la catastrophe Ayant mis la hache dans le recensement obligatoire, le gouvernement est encore accusé de privilégier l’idéologie au détriment de la science
  • City of Calgary Economic Development Authority: WHY THE CENSUS MATTERS
  • Radio Canada: Émission Le Téléjournal sur RDI, Diffusé 2010/07/07 à 21 h 14 Les Changement aux methodes de recensement de la population canadienne suscitent des reactions negatives
  • CBC News: Census: Is it an invasion of privacy?
  • CBC: Don’t cut long census form: Liberals
  • Worthwhile Canadian Initiative: 2011*
  • Epoch Times: Critics Fume over Census Decision Mandatory long-form scrapped, replaced with voluntary questionnaire
  • MaCleans: ‘The death of smart government
  • The Black Hole: Federal Government Scrapping The Census Long-Form: What Will It Mean for Evidence-Based Policy?
  • Liberal Senate Forum: 2011 Census
  • Le Devoir: Des stats qui comptent
  • Globe and Mail: Census revamp prompts debate over the right to reliable data
  • Globe and Mail: Why you should care about the sudden demise of the mandatory long census form
  • CBC Podcast on As it Happens: Census
  • Liberals: Liberals will make long census mandatory unless Conservatives reverse decision to scrap it
  • MaCleans: Census squabble: weak arguments shouldn’t have even worse foundations
  • Toronto Star: Travers: Census change latest move in PM’s dumbing down of Canada
  • Maclean’s: Former StatsCan head slams census decision by Tories
  • Maclean’s: Alarm on cuts to detailed census questionnaire spreads to business groups
  • Canadian Council on Policy Alternatives: CCPA Senior Economist calls Statistics Canada’s census decision “senseless”
  • Montreal Gazette: Canadians must be able to count on Statistics Canada Information allows us to make informed decisions
  • MaCleans: When ministers of the crown tweet
  • The Vancouver Sun: Canada needs its citizens to stand up and be counted
  • The Toronto Star: Tory census changes get static from statisticians
  • Previous Posts with media links:

  • More on Census Cuts
  • Ok! Something is afoul, and I am not sure it can be solely explained by technological glitches!

    The Reinstate our Census Long Form aka Questionnaire 2B, at 310 votes, can only be seen at this link, but should be the #1 ranked submission on the:

    Canada’s Digital Content Page

    and should be the number two ranked overall on the Consultation home page

    but does not appear on either! What is up with that!

    I have screen captures from that night and this morning.

    Contact Industry Canada here:

    So far I have contacted: David Louden 613-947-5972, I have spoken to Francine Quevillon at Brian Spurling’s Office, Kim Montpellier at Helen McDonald’s Office, and numerous people at the Client services of the IC site, Genevieve Sigouin 613-952-5480, IC IT Communications, Telephone: IC IT general Web Info 613-954-5031 email: info@ic.gc.ca; attention Phil Boulay

    Communications and Marketing Branch Director General
    Brian Spurling
    Telephone: 613-947-2597
    Fax: 613-947-3390
    Email: brian.spurling@ic.gc.ca

    Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications Assistant Deputy Minister
    Helen McDonald
    Telephone: 613-998-0368
    Fax: 613-952-1203
    Email: helen.mcdonald@ic.gc.ca

    I have also emailed the following people at media relations:
    nicole.barsalou@ic.gc.ca, media-relations-medias@ic.gc.ca, julie.iannetta@ic.gc.ca

    Overall! Industry Canada does not seem to have a point person on this file, or, at least, no one seems to know who that is.

    Please vote!

    Open Access to Canada’s Public Sector Information and Data

    and

    Reinstate our Census Long Form aka Questionnaire 2B

    I am on holiday now and will update DataLibre with a ton of the new media material on the Census next week.

    Actions:

    Vote on the Digital Strategy Submission: Reinstate the Census Long Form

    Letter Writing: Canadian Institute of Planners

    Petition: Keep the Canadian Census Long Form Petition

    Facebook Page: Keep the Canadian Census Long Form

    Opinion: Survey

    Media links:

    MaCleans: Former StatsCan head slams census decision by Tories

    Macleans: Alarm on cuts to detailed census questionnaire spreads to business groups

    Canadian Council on Policy Alternatives: CCPA Senior Economist calls Statistics Canada’s census decision “senseless”

    Montreal Gazette: Canadians must be able to count on Statistics Canada Information allows us to make informed decisions

    The Montreal Gazette: Ottawa may revamp restrictive new census rules

    The Progressive Economist Forum: Statistics Canada’s Senseless Census Decision

    The Montreal Gazette: Census overhaul rethought Historians, genealogists raised outcry

    Winnipeg Free Press: Don’t count on long census data: Tories scrub mandatory form

    The Winnipeg Free Press: Alarm on cuts to detailed census questionnaire spreads to business groups

    Toronto Star: Tories eliminate compulsory long census form

    Stephen Gordon: An incredibly stupid decision on the 2011 census and Why making the 2011 census long form voluntary is a bad idea.

    CBC As It Happens (July 5, 2010)

    CBC Metro Morning: Long Form Optional?
    Matt Galloway spoke with Eric Miller, about replacing the census long form with a voluntary version. He is the director of the Cities Centre at the University of Toronto.

    Social Policy in Ontario: Wrong move on census

    Family History for Beginners: Family History for Beginners

    Martin Prosperity Institute Blog – Harper’s Elimination of Census Long Form Hurts All Canadians

    Phantom Observer: On Next Year’s Census – And Its Implications For The Harper Agenda

    The Galloping Beaver: Census Lobotomy and Censlessness

    Montreal Gazette: Canadians must be able to count on Statistics Canada: Information allows us to make informed decisions

    Previous Post: 2011 Census severely slashed

    The CIP is encouraging the following:

    members to contact their local MP, Click here to find your MP by postal code, or refer to this complete list of Canada’s Members of Parliament sorted by constituency.

    * Ask your MP to reverse the decision to eliminate the long-form Census questionnaire
    * Tell your MP how Census data is important to you and your work or area of study
    * Send a paper letter instead of an e-mail. A paper letter is usually taken more seriously than an e-mail, because many MPs receive several hundred e-mails a day.
    * Be sure to cc Minister Tony Clement. His address is:

    C.D. Howe Building
    235 Queen Street
    Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H5

    via: Canadian Institute of Planners

    Carl Malamud: 10 Rules For Radicals

    Rule 1 : Call everything an experiment.

    Rule 2: When the starting gun goes off, run really fast. As a small player, the elephant can step on you, but you can outrun the elephant.

    Rule 3: Eyeballs rule. If a million people use your service, and on the Internet you can do that, you’ve got a lot more credibility than if you’re just issuing position papers and flaming the man.

    Rule 4: When the time comes, be nice.

    Rule 5: Keep asking until they say yes. Gordon Bell, the inventor of the VAX, once said that you should keep your vision, but modify your plan.

    Rule 6: When you get the microphone, get to the point. Be clear about what you want.

    Rule 7: Get standing. Have some skin in the game, some reason you’re at the table.

    Rule 8: Get them to threaten you.

    Rule 9: Look for overreaching, things that are just blatantly, obviously wrong or silly.

    Rule 10, which is don’t be afraid to fail. It took Thomas Edison 10,000 times before he got the light bulb right, and when he was asked about those failures, he said “I have not failed, I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.”

    Datalibre was sent an email from Resource Shelf with some additional information regarding these 10 rules such as anOverview of the presentation and the full keynote

    via: CivicAcces List

    A surprise announcement was made by Statistics Canada that the long form of the Population Census is no longer obligatory. These are questions that have been asked for the last 7 Censuses and suddenly without notice or evidence to support the decision, these will not be part of the 2011 Census. This was not an issue discussed or on the table during Statistics Canada’s Census public consultations.

    Insiders tell me that Statistics Canada did not approve of this change and was ordered to do so by The Harper Government.

    This has very serious implications for those who monitor social indicators and use these data to inform policy on: immigration, ethnicity, visible minorities, education, labour, culture, religion, linguistics, income, women, transportation, commuting, unpaid work, housing and etc. in Canada.

    The long form will become a voluntary National Household Survey (NHS), conducted 4 weeks after the census disseminated to a much smaller sample size. This will affect any kind of longitudinal research as it will no be backward compatible with previous Censuses.

    I have contacted StatCan to find reports or studies that would have provided the evidence to support such a radical decision. I have also contacted the offices of the Information Commissioner, Privacy Commissioner. I think I will now contact my MP, opposition parties and so on. Here is Canada Gazetter Order in Council that approved the 2011 Population Census. It is not that informative as there is no context as to why the long form is not included.

    Below are media on the issue. I will capture PDFs of these articles.

    CBC: Tories scrap mandatory long census – Move could affect amount of detailed information obtained

    Bender would not comment, however, on how the change might affect the data in terms of whether respondents of a certain socio-economic or ethno-cultural background might be more or less inclined to answer the longer survey.

    Peter Morrison, assistant chief statistician responsible for the census, said that he knows of no other country that has made a similar move. He would not confirm that the idea was not one proposed by Statistics Canada, nor would he or Bender address whether the move is something statisticians agree with.

    “Our role is to execute the decision that was made [by the government],” he said, adding that he is optimistic it can be a success.

    Globe and Mail: Tories scrap mandatory long-form census – StatsCan says quality of data will suffer.

    “What we can tell you is that the data we will release will be of quality, but we do acknowledge that we may not get the same level of detail as that of a census,” said Rosemary Bender, director-general of the agency’s census, social and demographic statistics branch.

    “This is something we’ll be monitoring closely.”

    Insiders who spoke to The Canadian Press on condition of anonymity decry a new world order within the agency since the Conservatives came to power in 2006 and legendary chief statistician Ivan Fellegi retired.

    Montreal Gazette: Census restrictions hurt historians Feds cite privacy. Genealogists slams new rules protecting data.

    The idea of doing away with the long census questionnaire form, transferring the questions to the NHS and no longer releasing the information did not become public until Saturday, when it appeared in a government publication.
    ,,,
    The decision to change the census came from the federal government and not from the ministry or Statistics Canada, he said.

    Toronto Star: Tories eliminate compulsory long census form

    The federal government is scrapping the mandatory long census form in favour of a voluntary survey — a move some critics blame on a Conservative campaign to slash analytical work done by Statistics Canada.

    For the first time in 35 years, the census will not feature a detailed, long form that Canadians are obliged to send back to the government.

    Ottawa Citizen:Genealogists slam new restrictions on census information.

    A door to Canada’s past has slammed shut, leaving future Canadians with very little information about their own families and the country’s history, in a move the government says was prompted by privacy concerns.

    Statistics Canada has quietly made major changes to the country’s census in time for the upcoming round of national sampling in 2011. The long census questionnaire that provided information on a broad range on such topics as ethnicity, education, employment, income, housing and disability has been eliminated. Instead, those questions will be asked on a new, voluntary National Household Survey (NHS) and the results will never be released, in contrast with the treasure trove of census data that currently becomes public after 92 years.

    Cyberpresse: Recensement: le formulaire détaillé obligatoire éliminé

    Le gouvernement fédéral a décidé d’éliminer le formulaire détaillé de recensement obligatoire au profit d’une enquête à participation volontaire, une décision que certains observateurs imputent à une campagne conservatrice menée afin que soit réduit le travail d’analyse fait par Statistique Canada.

    Edmonton Journal: Restrictions on census information criticized

    Officials from Statistics Canada say the 2011 census went through the usual consultation process, with citizens invited to provide feedback online. The idea of doing away with the long census questionnaire form and no longer releasing the information did not become public until Saturday.

    As many of you are aware, there was an earthquake in Canada today that was felt on both sides of the provincial border between Quebec and Ontario in the Outaouais region as well as on both sides of our national border with the US. Shortly after the earthquake occurred, I searched for up to the minute seismic data.

    I immediately went to Earthquake Canada, and sadly it was not working, and did not start working until well after the twittersphere fed many USGS links. See #earthquake.

    When Earthquake Canada started to work, there was just a mention of a seismic event. At 6PM today, I accessed the following informative data:

    The USGS Earthquake Hazard Program worked immediately and delivered the following information in near real time:


    Observations:

    The Earthquake Canada data display is static, does not provide the user with much context but is aesthetically pleasing. The USGS data display was instantaneous, dynamic and was accompanied with a visual cue enabling the viewer to decipher the magnitude of the quake on a scale. The data are easy to read and the user can zoom in and out to see more precisely where the earthquake occurred.

    Both services ask the public to provide information about what they felt. The Canada Felt Report wishes to assess:

    the extent of shaking and damage for earthquakes in Canada. The specific details you may provide will help us determine how your area may respond to future earthquakes.

    In the US the Did you Feel it? solicits the reporting of unknown events and provides a list of up to the minute data from which the user can assess whether or not their report is new.

    Both sites also provide educational information. The USGS site also provides real time data feeds and KML formats as well as a Earthquake Notification Service.

    Both sites also provide access to a variety of seismic data. The Geological Survey of Canada has a fully searchable Earthquake Database containing data starting in 1985, albeit the data are made accessible with a rather restrictive end-user agreement. The USGS Catalog searches a number of databases that are global or region specific, provided by different agencies and have varying date ranges. Because data are accessed from numerous databases it was difficult to assess data licensing, however, generally in the US data are a public record and are in the public domain.

    Overall, the USGS fared better on timeliness, reliability, useability, interactivity, includes more data, and has at a glance the data can be used with less restrictions. I however, am partial to the cartography on the Canada GSC site.

    « Older entries § Newer entries »