Open data is happening on one side of government while access to data and information is getting either reduced or locked down in other parts.  This story about muzzling archivists was released some weeks ago.

An anecdote.  Yesterday I went to see the movie NO, about the marketing campaign for the NO side of the plebiscite against the Chilean Pinochet dictatorship. The movie was terrible, the sentiment excellent, and the timing with the ongoing trials, probably no accident.  As my son and my visiting friend were lamenting the quality of the film, I explained the politics of it to them, but also, why it is so important to have an impartial and protected national archive that allows for access to all the footage, news clips and story boards that were shown in the film.  I explained what was going on with our archive, and, they got the picture. They began to rethink how they understood the role of the archive.

Will our archives, librarians and archivists be able to answer the following questions in the future?

I mean honestly? What first world democratic country does that?

Below are links to material that librarians and archivists sent my way in confidence.

This presentation contains the Code of Conduct statements Library and Archives (LAC) Archivists must now follow.

  1. Calgary Herald: ABCs of ‘behaviour regulation’ for federal librarians and archivists
  2. CBC Podcast: of the Library Code of Conduct on As It Happens
  3. BoingBoing blog post: Canadian government muzzles librarians and archivists, creates snitch line to report those who speak online or in public without permission
  4. British Columbia Library Association Response.
  5. Save Library and Archives Campaign

The Open Data Exchange (ODX13) was a really great day. Below are my slides and related URLS.  The main point was to discuss how we take the learning by doing that has been ongoing in the open data field and now begin to integrate long standing and well established open access to data thinking such standards, governance, collaboration and cross-domain.  Also, how to approach ad-hoc open data initiatives and move them toward an interoperable and standards based way of doing things, much like how geospatial data infrastructures have been developed.  In addition, to think about data management, their life-cycle and preservation for future generations.

Slide 1:
Geospatial Data Infrastructures s are the institutions, policies, technologies, processes and standards and framework data that direct the who, how, what and why geospatial data are collected, stored, manipulated, analyzed, transformed and shared, MULTIDIMENSIONAL, INTERSECTORAL, CROSS-DOMAIN, INTERDEPARTMENTAL, REQUIRING NATIONAL CONSENSUS BUILDING.

  • Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) Association – http://www.gsdi.org/
  • GSDI Cookbook – http://www.gsdidocs.org/GSDIWiki/index.php/Main_Page

Slide 2:
Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI): http://geoconnections.nrcan.gc.ca/home

Slide 3:
Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) – http://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.shtml

Slide 4:
Global Map International Steering Committee for Global Mapping Specifications: http://www.iscgm.org/cgi-bin/fswiki/wiki.cgi?page=Documentation

Slide 5 :
Agenda 21 Rio 1992 Chapter on Information for Decision Making – http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=52

Slide 6:

  • IPY Data Management Policy: http://www.api-ipy.gc.ca/pg_IPYAPI_055-eng.html
  • Canadian Polar Data Network: http://polardatanetwork.ca/
  • Polar Data Catalogue: http://polardata.ca/
  • Datacite Canada: http://cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/services/cisti/datacite-canada/index.html

Slide 7:
Thinking about the lifecycle of data:

  • Digital Curation Centre: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model and http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/DCCLifecycle.pdf

Many great public submissions were made today in Québec City on the reforms to access to information laws.

The following are a few posted by members of the Civicaccess.ca list:

  1. Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec Soumission
  2. Open North, submission can be listened to at the audio-visual link below
  3. Quebec Ouvert, Soumission
  4. Centre for Law and Democracy  – Canada: Serious Problem in Québec Openess Law
  5. Canadian Internet Public Policy Clinic (CIPPIC) – Technologies et vie privée à l’heure des choix de société / Privacy & the Right to Information in a Rapidly Evolving Technological Landscape

You can also listen to their audio/visual recordings of the consultations and their submissions given in the Assemblée nationale du Québec.

This is a great example of how civil society is engaged in the direction of public policy and law.

 

Organized by:Ted Strauss  @trudatted

Naomi Kincler @namikinc

(see registration information here)

A mini-conference to discuss the successes and challenges of extracting value from Open Data for civic engagement, international aid transparency, scientific research, and more!
Une mini-conférence pour discuter des réussites – et des défis – de la mise en valeur des données ouvertes en matière d’engagement citoyen, de transparence dans l’utilisation des fonds publics, de recherche scientifique, et plus encore!

Program

Morning Session – Open Data Stories; Panel Discussions

9:00 AM    Introduction and Welcome

9:15 AM    Winning with Open Data – Panel 1

10:10 AM    Les données ouvertes en pratique – Panel 2

  • Guillaume Ducharme, gestionnaire dans le réseau de la santé et membre du collectif Démocratie Ouverte
  • Sébastien Pierre, fondateur, FFunction & Montréal Ouvert
  • Josée Plamondon, développeur ContratsNet
  • Jean-Noé Landry (l’animateur de discussion), fondateur, Montréal Ouvert et Québec Ouvert

11:05 AM    Future Avenues for Open Data – Panel 3

12:00 PM    Lunch will be provided

Afternoon Session – Digging into Data; Workshop and Lightning Talks

1:00 PM    Data Dive Intro – Exploratory Data Analysis with Trudat

1:30 PM    Data Dive

We will dive into interesting Open Data sets with experts on hand to guide us through the weeds, including data on

  • International Aid
  • Government contracts
  • Biodiversity
  • and more…

3:00 PM   Lightning Talks

4:00 PM    Present data insights

4:45 PM    Closing remarks

Updated April 29, 2013

If you are planning an Open Data event, an expert panel on the topic, looking for a conference speaker, or someone to interview for a news article, you might want to consider inviting some of the experts from this list.

If you know of people to add, please email me – tlauriau at gmail dot com.

Canada:

  • Mary Beth Baker, Founding member of Open Data Ottawa, website
  • Natalie Black, programmer for Nimonik.ca
  • Ashley Casovan, Strategic Coordinator – Advisor to the CIO at  City of Edmonton, ashley dot casovan at edmonton dot ca
  • Julia Evans, data scientist & programmer. About.
  • Trish Garner, City of Toronto, Manager of Web Strategy, @trishgarner, Open Data Portal
  • Tracey P. Lauriault, Founding member of CivicAccess.ca list, Datalibre.ca, blog & bio
  • Heather Leson, Director of Community Engagement at Ushahidi, and see Textontechs, bio
  • Hillary Little, UI and Design, bio
  • Alison Loat, Samara, bio
  • Ellie Marshall, Open Northellie at opennorth do  ca
  • Diane Mercier, Open Data Advisor Ville de Montréal, Website
  • Josee Plamondon, app developer Contratsnet, jplamondon at gmail doc com
  • Gina Porcarelli, City of Toronto, Linkedin
  • Catherine Roy, Citizen member of the City of Montreal Table de concertation, web consultant, BIO
  • Laine Ruus, first data librarian in Canada, University of Toronto, Bio
  • Sheyda Saneinejad, Engineer, Innovation Lab
  • Teresa Scassa, Canada Research Chair in Information Law, Blog, Bio
  • Karen Smith, I School U of T, Bio
  • Wendy Watkins, Founding member of the Data Liberation Initiative (paper), contact

International:

 

I just came back from a whirlwind trip to Taiwan and Japan.

In Taiwan I presented a the CODATA 2012 conference Open Data and Information for a Changing Planet.  CODATA (Committee on Data for Science and Technology) is an interdisciplinary Scientific Committee of the International Council for Science (ICSU), which works to improve the quality, reliability, management and accessibility of data of importance to all fields of science and technology.  Canada has a Canadian National Committee for CODATA, based out of The National Research Council of Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI) and the focus is scientific and research data and their preservation.  CODATA are the systems of systems folks, focusing on large data infrastructures.  The World Data Systems (WDS) folks also joined the conference and I had the good fortune of meeting some World Data Centre (WDS) directors. WDCs are a critical component in the sharing and preservation of scientific data and they undergo a rigorous certification process which many open data cities, provinces and federal initiatives might want to consider in their planning.

There were many great sessions at the conference, and the Mass Collaboration Data Project and Policies session is particularly relevant here.

  • Shun-ling Chen, a Harvard Law School PhD Candidate, provided a historical review of copyright and how mass collaboration projects are changing perspectives.
  • Puneet Kishor from the Creative Science Commons, a renowned CC0 advocate announced that he was willing to accept that scientists and scientific data need attribution, something I thought was quite obvious, but it seemed to be revelatory to him.  He also showcased his earth-base project which provides another way to search for scientific data.
  • Mikel Maron from GroundTruth Initiative discussed Open Street Map (OSM) in developing countries, particularly those who suffered a disaster.  He re-iterated that OSM is a community project not a crowd project, as crowd has negative connotations and he also discussed the issues related to place name politics whereby it was important to sometimes shut down the ability to change the names of contested places.  This brought tension to a consensus process like OSM.
  • Kerstin Lehnert, of Integrated Earth Data Applications (IEDA) discussed the integration of physical things and the need for uniform metadata for samples in order to do so.  We have the Internet of Things but the physical things that are sampled are not very well connected to the Internet.
  • Te-En Lin introduced a Citizen Science roadkill project in Taiwan.  It used FB as a means to get citizens engaged in photographing the road kill they encountered.  The project continuously had to refine its process as scale was an issue when identifying squashed critters, and so they taught people to put their shoe or other identifiable objects beside the creatures.  Eventually, people were going to corner stores and laminating their finds and sending them to him.  Hilarious.  He now has approximately 800 jarred samples which are all georeferenced and they will be using these data to develop remediation projects.
  • Mike Linksvayer, was provocative in stating that copyright makes us stupider and is stupid and that it should be abolished all together.  I argued that for traditional knowledge where people are seriously marginalized and where TK is exploited, copyright might be the only way to protect themselves.  We wound up having a late night jet lagged discussion in the hall way of the hotel and I think we understood each others perspectives more while still maintaining our stances.  He also introduced his submission Future of Copyright to the Future of Copyright contest for which is was classed in the top 10.

In addition to the conference I organized a meetup of local open data folks in Taiwan.  Open Data Taiwan graciously accepted the invitation and organized a dinner at a great Thai Restaurant and at a local cafe.

  • Weitze CHANG (aka Whisky), from the Youth Synergy Taiwan Foundation, a social enterprise promoting critical thinking, answered the call and organized a local meetup.  He facilitated some great discussion on open data challenges in Taiwan and was very interested in the kind of work being done in Canada, the UK and Internationally.
  • Dennis Raylin Chen also from the Youth Synergy Taiwan Foundation, did much on the ground coordination and participated as a citizen journalist at the CODATA 2012 conference.
  • Jack Townsend, who presented a project at the conference called globe-town.org also joined and shared some of his knowledge about the open data work he does on sustainable development.
  • 4-5 other fine open data folks also joined the meetup and I will post their contact when I have them.

We were also shown two very interesting open data projects.

Space is at a premium in Taiwan and there was much price gouging as no one really knew what things actually cost relative to each other as these data were never published.  The government tried to release them on a case by case basis until their system crashed as robots were endeavouring to scrape the data minutes after it was launched at midnight on a weeknight.  The government relented and released the entire dataset and this mashup is the result of that.

This visualization provides many views to how the Government of Taiwan spends.

I will update this post as my new friends in Taiwan send me more information.

The University of New Brunswick invited me to give the Keynote at their inaugural Open Access Week Annual Conference: Bailiwick.  The Conference was organized by the Information Services and Systems at UNBSJ who are developing an Open Access Plan, developing an institutional repository to preserve and manage their research output. I had the good fortune of spending an afternoon with the Library and Information System staff, tour the campus and visit the town. The objective of the talk was to introduce what open means and not only on open data.

Presentation links in order of appearance:

Scenarios:

Where to find data:

Data Access Advocacy:


Mapping The Legal Boundaries of Digital Cartography Workshop
Centre for Law, Technology and Society (CLTS)
the Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre (GCRC) and the Canadian Internet Public Policy and Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
Nov. 14, 2012
Louis Pasteur Hall, Ottawa University
Room: LPR 285
13:15 – 17:00

Theme:
Surveying the legal terrain and charting the course
Moderated by:
Tracey P. Lauriault
Welcome:
13:30 – 13:40: Introduction – D. R. Fraser Taylor, GCRC & Teresa Scassa, CLTS
Traditional Knowledge:
13:40 – 13:55: Traditional Knowledge and Legal Digital Cartography, Teresa Scassa, CLTS
13:55 – 14:10: Toward a Traditional Knowledge License, David Fewer, CIPPIC
14:10 – 14:25: Embedding Law in an Indigenous Atlas Infrastructure, Amos Hayes, GCRC
14:25 – 14:45: Inuit Knowledge Stewardship, Scot Nickels, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) and Timothy Di Leo Browne, Canadian Studies  Student, Carleton University
14:45 – 15:10:  Discussion
Authorship and Digital Cartography:
15:10 – 15:25: Third Party Use of Base Maps, Adam Saunders, Law Student, Ottawa University
15:25 – 15:40: Copyright and Joint Authorship in Cartography, Elizabeth Judge, CLTS
Practical Geospatial Policies – Resolving Operational Issues
15:40 – 16:00: Simon Riopel and Sophie Sliwa, GeoConnections, Natural Resources Canada
Discussion
16:00 – 17:00

A group of open data specialist participated in the Civicus World Assembly in Montreal as panelist for a session called: How civil society can (and already does) use open data.

The session was well attended and generated some excellent questions from people from IT in Yemen, Nepal, IDRC, non-profit IT, health practitioners, UK third sector academics, a city ombudsperson, philanthropy, citizen scientists and more.  It was promised that we would share the resources mentioned at the session and here they are:

MORE Forthcoming.

Une initiative citoyenne à but non-lucratif et non-partisane qui a pour but de promouvoir l’accès ouvert aux données civiques de la région de Montréal.
Une initiative citoyenne pan-québécoise à but non-lucratif et non-partisane qui a pour but de promouvoir l’accès ouvert aux données civiques de la province du Québec.
Portail des données ouvertes de la Ville de Montréal
Portail des données ouvertes de la province du Québec.
Application web qui situe et visualise l’état des patinoires en utilisant les rapports quotidiens de conditions des patinoires de la Ville de Montréal.
Application web qui géolocalise et analyse par type d’établissement les rapports d’inspections de salubrité des restaurants montréalais.

Guest Blog post by Mark Weiler:

Thirty-years ago, on July 7th, 1982, the Parliament of Canada gave Royal Assent to the Access to Information Act, which became Canada’s first freedom of information legislation.

The Access to Information Act is important for Canadian society because it is through this legislation that the Parliament of Canada, the highest authority in the country, grants Canadians permission to access information held by approximately 250 departments of the federal governments, overruling lower authorities within government who might think otherwise.

With Royal Assent, a transformation began that turned most departments in the federal government into something like public libraries, or perhaps public archives. The transformation would reach a milestone on July 1st 1983 when the Access to Information Act became enforced.

However, in the thirty years since Royal Assent something of a betrayal has occurred. When given a public platform, FOI users, such as the media, often perpetuate narratives premised on the message that “the Access to Information Act is broken.” While this might get public attention and bolster a worthy goal of holding government more accountable for failures to properly implement the Access to Information Act, perpetuating this message also betrays the broader Canadian public.

Such a message is a betrayal because it gives the impression that there’s no point in using the Access to Information Act; it is a discouraging message. But to say the “Access to Information Act is broken” is a bit like pronouncing the public library “broken” because some people are having a problem accessing materials on the 7th floor while these and other FOI patrons are successfully accessing materials on every other floor in the library.

Yes, those materials on the 7th floor are important; and yes it’s a serious problem if politicians or government officials are unlawfully withholding them. But it’s misleading to give people the impression that the “public library” is shut down.

The reality is the Access to Information Act works for many people. In 2010-2011, materials were “checked out” almost 42,000 times from approximately 250 federal departments. If the Access to Information Act was broken, then this statistic should be part of a downward trend. But in the last ten years, the number of “check outs” has increased year by year.

We therefore have reason to believe that the Access to Information Act, grounded in Parliament’s decree that every Canadian “has a right to and shall, on request, be given access to any record under the control of a government institution”, is working even though it could do better in some circumstances.

To regain faith in how government department’s live up to Parliament’s decree, it is worthwhile to look at what people and organizations have been “checking out” of this new brand of public information repositories. The federal government has adopted a policy of posting “summaries of completed ATI requests” on almost 140 departmental websites, so it’s easy to get a sense of how people are benefiting from the permission granted to them by Parliament thirty years ago. Links to these departmental webpages can be found here.

« Older entries § Newer entries »